By Climate Denier Roundup
wasn’t an ordinary storm. It killed more than a thousand people in Haiti and at least 20 in the U.S. Its trail of widespread devastation was shocking and it will take the affected regions time to recover.
But while 1.5 million people were being asked by Republican governors to head to safety for the fear for their lives, Drudge
if the government was lying to its people to “make an exaggerated point on
.” During the time when hurricane-related reported deaths in Haiti jumped from 20 to more than 300, Drudge questioned National Hurricane Center’s data in a
. Several people (such as
Jason Samenow of WaPo
Libby Nelson of Vox
) wrote against his outrageous claims for not only trying to score cheap political gains but also putting lives in danger.
Without having any other evidence to disprove the solid climate science
linking Hurricane Matthew to climate change
, the denial community has been repeating one fact ad nauseam—the
major hurricane drought
.” It’s a classic case of cherry-picking data that trivializes the lives disrupted and lost by
While the U.S. has been fortunate that no
has made landfall in the past decade as a Category 3 or higher, the fact remains that hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin
has increased since the 1970s
. And there is also increasing evidence of landfalling
in Asia have
become more intense
over the last four decades due to warmer waters. Politifact has
a great article
on this subject.
From the time it became apparent that the hurricane will seriously impact the U.S., everyone swung into action. Experts sought to look for climate signals to understand in advance what potential impacts might be. Governors announced states of emergency and mandated evacuations. Climate deniers peddled conspiracy theories.
While most stocked up on food and water, deniers were content with tin foil.